Document Type: Research report

Summary

In-depth case studies illustrating the loopholes that allow child maintenance avoidance – where paying parents are able to minimise the amount of child support they’re requested to pay. The report shows how rules – and the way that they’re implemented – under the Child Support Agency and Child Maintenance Service mean that some parents are paying sums which bear little relation to their actual wealth.

The report recommends:

  • Better income data sharing between the CMS and HMRC
  • Reinstated anti-evasion safeguards
  • Proper support for parents to challenge their calculation
  • A joint DWP/HMRC review of the role of HMRC when determining child maintenance
  • Better co-ordination with the family courts.

Key findings

  • Reforms under the CMS mean the system is cheap to administer, but fail children
  • Parents are left in the dark about their options, meaning many give up on a fair assessment
  • The DWP passes the buck to HMRC, which means there is often limited investigation into paying parents’ finances
  • Reforms under the CMS, which abolished some grounds to challenge child maintenance calculations, mean it is even harder to get a fair assessment.

Senior Policy Officer, Janet Allbeson, discussing the findings of ‘Children deserve more.’

Children deserve more: challenging child maintenance avoidance

9th Jul 2017

Summary In-depth case studies illustrating the loopholes that allow child maintenance avoidance – where paying parents are able to minimise the amount of child support they’re requested to pay. The report shows how rules – and...

Key findings Reforms under the CMS mean the system is cheap to administer, but fail children Parents are left in the dark about their options, meaning many give up on a fair assessment The DWP passes the buck...

Read more

On the rise: single parent sanctions in numbers

9th Apr 2017

Summary The government maintains benefit sanctions are only used as a last resort for a very small minority of claimants. This briefing illustrates how the DWP understates Jobseeker’s Allowance (JSA) sanction rates, how the risk of...

Key findings Benefit sanctions are a significant part of the benefit system, and cannot be dismissed as a minor element – at a recent peak, around one in seven single parents claiming JSA were sanctioned Single parents...

Read more

Kids aren’t free: the child maintenance arrangements of single parents on benefit in 2012

1st Jun 2013

Summary Gingerbread, in partnership with NatCen and Bryson Purdon Social Research, looked at child maintenance arrangements among low income single parent families (those receiving out-of-work benefits in 2012) – assessing their impact, longevity and likely impact...

Key findings In 2012, child maintenance lifted one in five single parents on the lowest incomes who received child maintenance out of poverty Before changes to allow receiving parents to keep their child maintenance, rather than treat...

Read more